- Information Sheet for Accused Students (PDF)
- Information Sheet for Complaint Parties (PDF)
- Preparing for a University Hearing or Disciplinary Conference (PDF)
- Preparing Witness Statements (PDF)
A Disciplinary Conference is an informal administrative meeting between an accused student, the complaint party, the Preliminary Review Officer, and a Conduct Officer. The Conduct Officer considers information from both parties and determines whether the student is responsible for the charges.
3. The Preliminary Review Officer presents his or her report summarizing the review. The Conduct Officer allows the student and the complaint party to ask clarifying questions of the Preliminary Review Officer.
4. The complaint party gives his or her narrative, describing in detail the incident in question. At this point the complaint party can introduce his or her physical evidence.
6. The accused student then gives his or her narrative and introduces physical evidence.
7. The Conduct Officer questions the accused student, then allows the complaint party to ask questions.
8. If there are any factual witnesses, they are called one at a time. Each witness gives a narrative, describing his or her knowledge of the event in question. The Conduct Officer questions the witnesses, then the accused student and the complaint party can ask questions of each witness.
10. The Conduct Officer concludes the Disciplinary Conference. He or she considers the information presented by the parties and determines whether the student is in violation. If he or she finds the student responsible, the Conduct Officer imposes or recommends a sanction, taking into consideration the sanction recommendations of the various parties.
11. The Conduct Officer notifies the parties of the outcome of the Disciplinary Conference in writing.
12. Accused students (and in some cases, complainants) have the right to appeal the outcome of a Disciplinary Conference. See The Conduct Appeal Process for more information.